About us

News

Regulatory

Health and Safety

Financial Services

Criminal law

Motoring

Civil litigation

Contact/location

People

Publications

Links

 

24 hour police station service: 020 7632 4300

 



Special reasons for not disqualifying or endorsing your licence


Hannah Sampson (Solicitor)

 

The UK’s 32 million qualified drivers will come into contact with the law more than any other section of the public and yet the average motorist doesn’t know a great deal about their legal position. Due to the wealth of motoring offences that can be committed, motorists find it all too easy to conflict with the police and courts system. When they do fall foul of the rules, it is likely to be very costly, often resulting in a loss of licence, a hefty fine and at worst a loss of liberty.

The law provides that a period of disqualification is obligatory in certain situations, (examples being convictions for driving with excess alcohol, dangerous driving or in "totting up" situations where twelve points accumulate within three years).  However, “special reasons” can be argued for not disqualifying for these offences, or for not endorsing (particularly important if you already have nine points on your licence thereby avoiding a "totting up" disqualification).

The law, as usual, is not straight forward! What might, to you, seem to be a "special reason" (losing your job) is not a special reason in law.

A special reason is one which is special to the facts which constitute the offence, not amounting in law to a defence to the charge, yet directly connected with the commission of the offence and one which the Court ought properly to take into consideration when imposing punishment. The Courts laid down minimum criteria as long ago as 1946, which must be satisfied if "special reasons" are to be made out.

Thus, "my drink was laced out of spite and I was unaware I was drinking alcohol; I had to exceed the speed limit to get my sick child to hospital;" may amount to special reasons but it is vital that you have expert assistance to argue the point.

 

Recently we were approached by a client who was facing a charge of failing to provide a specimen of breath. Given that he had refused to provide the specimen when under arrest he was guilty of the offence. However, our client was in dire straits. This offence attracts a mandatory minimum ban of 12 months. As a mechanic, with his own business, driving dozens of vehicles a day, our client’s whole future was at stake.

 

Some detailed research has meant that we have been able to persuade a court that he may have a special reasons argument relating to his state of mind at the time he refused to provide the specimen whilst in custody. This is due for a full hearing next month and if the court find our arguments to be made out then this client will keep his licence and be able to continue to make a living and provide for his young family. We will keep you posted.

 

On a lighter note, did you know that the Licensing Act of 1872 explains that operating a cow, horse or steam engine while intoxicated carries either a prison sentence. So no riding a cow while you're drunk.
In the UK, a man who feels compelled to urinate in public can do so only if he aims for his rear wheel and keeps his right hand on his vehicle.