TALK TO ONE OF OUR SOLICITORS TODAY CALL US ON 02076324300 existing clients call 0207 632 4300
TALK TO ONE OF OUR SOLICITORS TODAY 02076324300existing clients call 0207 632 4300

News

2 minutes reading time (360 words)

British arms sales to Saudi Arabia held to be based on irrational decision-making process

On 20 June 2019, in R (Campaign Against Arms Trade) v Secretary of State for International Trade [2019] EWCA Civ 1020, the Court of Appeal upheld a challenge to the lawfulness of the UK Government’s grant of export licences for the sale of arms and military equipment to Saudi Arabia which could have potentially been used in the conflict in Yemen.

In this judicial review brought by the Campaign  Against Arms Trade, the Court of Appeal held that the Government’s decision-making process had been irrational as it had not included an assessment as to whether Saudi Arabia had previously violated international humanitarian law in the Yemen conflict and so could not have properly assessed the risk of future violations. This is important as under the UK’s export policy, such licences should not be granted if there is a "clear risk" that weapons might be used in "serious violation of international humanitarian law".

The Court held that a covert change of UK policy towards Saudi Arabia had taken place in 2016 where it was decided that there would be no assessment of past violations of international humanitarian law when signing off on arms exports.

The Court ordered the government to hold an immediate review of all its arms export licences made to Saudi Arabia since the start of the conflict in March 2015 (estimated to be £4.7bn in value). In response, Liam Fox, the International Trade Secretary, announced that the Government would not grant any new licences for export to Saudi Arabia and its coalition partners while it considers the judgment, but also promised to appeal against the judgment.

It is worth clarifying that the Court explicitly did not comment on what the outcome of the decision-making process would have been had it been carried out correctly.

At Saunders Law we understand that unlawful decisions of the state, particularly those relating to government policy, professional regulation and public services, can have very real and damaging consequences for both individuals and organisations. We have vast experience helping our clients pursue judicial review and are dedicated to getting unlawful decisions overturned as quickly and cost-effectively as possible.

Call us on 020 3811 3592 or make an enquiry online.

Inquest into death of Nuno Cardoso following restr...
Make an enquiry

Complete our online enquiry form and we'll get back to you as soon as possible




Invalid Input



Invalid Input



Invalid Input



Invalid Input



Invalid Input



Invalid Input



Invalid Input

Have you read and agree to our Privacy Policy here
Invalid Input




legal 500uk 2016 sash

Contact one of our expert solicitors today

MAKE AN ENQUIRY 02076324300 existing clients call 0207 632 4300
recommended by Legal 500
ranked in Chambers UK

Latest News

British arms sales to Saudi Arabia held to be based on irrational decision-making process

08 July 2019

On 20 June 2019, in R (Campaign Against Arms Trade) v Secretary of State for International Trade [2019] EWCA Civ 1020, the Court of Appeal upheld a challenge to the lawfulness of t...

Inquest into death of Nuno Cardoso following restraint by Thames Valley Police opens Monday 8 July 2019

05 July 2019

Before HM Senior Coroner for Oxfordshire Michael Salter, Oxford Coroner’s Court, County Hall, New Road, Oxford, OX1 1NDNuno Cardoso, a 25 year old law student from Kentish Town, died followi...