James Saunders comments on the Antonio Lopes case were published today in the Eastern Daily Press

Convicted Norfolk murderer could fight for freedom - if court rules in favour of retesting DNA

22nd May 2014

Antonio Lopes is serving a life sentence after a jury at Norwich Crown Court found him guilty of the "wicked and brutal" killing of Dominguez Olivais in Great Yarmouth in 2002. Ms Olivais' body was found washed up on the muddy banks of the River Bure in Yarmouth on April 28.

Lopes was found guilty of strangling her, violating her dead body with a piece of wood and dumping her in the water.

More than a decade on, jailed Lopes continues to protest his innocence - and he could soon challenge his conviction if a test case at the Supreme Court rules in favour of allowing DNA samples in a Suffolk murder case to be reexamined.

Lopes' defence lawyer James Saunders said the outcome in Kevin Nunn's case could see his client's conviction reviewed by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), the body charged with examining potential wrongful convictions.

It hinges, he said, on access to a stick which was used to attack Ms Olivais.

Nunn, of Woolpit in Suffolk, is currently serving a minimum of 22 years for the murder of his former partner, Dawn Walker.

If the London court rules that Nunn's defence team, lead by Mr Saunders, can use today's advanced technology to look again at DNA in his case, it would open the way for Lopes to appeal.

Mr Saunders said the evidence used to convict Lopes in 2003 was mainly circumstantial - a vehicle believed to be his car was seen on CCTV on Tar Works Road near the Bure hours before Olivais was murdered and again after. The prosecution said that showed premeditation.

Lopes, who claimed he was at McDonalds on the night, had scratches on his face and neck. There was damage on the inside of his car, including cracks to the windscreen.

At her funeral he acted "as normal", and one person questioned by police believed the couple had argued in the days before her death.

The prosection said Lopes' DNA was found on fingernail cuttings taken from Ms Olivais' body and forensic examination of the car indicated a struggle inside.

Mr Saunders, however, said: "The DNA work was unsatisfactory at the time and in the 10 years since there have been huge advances.

"The key exhibit here is a stick which will logically have the DNA of the killer on it.

"That stick is currently in a sealed bag in a Norfolk police station somewhere and we can't get to it.

"I have to have some belief that the Supreme Court will see the possibility of finding out the truth and having the guilty behind bars."

Opponents claim a ruling in favour of retesting DNA samples could lead to a lack of finality with the justice system - as science improves, more and more closed cases and convictions based on circumstantial evidence could potentially be reopen.

Mr Saunders, however, believes the Nunn ruling would lead to "dozens or maybe a few hundred" appeals.

"It's a manageable number, and this is so important," he said.

"This is not just about getting innocent people out of jail. These cases are predominately rapes and murders and those are the ones we want in prison.

"Just look at the Victor Nealon case.

"He is a man who didn't do it, whose case was turned down by the CCRC two times. He served 17 years in jail and now we know he is innocent. What happened in that case illustrates what could well happen in Toni Lopes' case."

Earlier this week the CCRC apologised to Mr Nealon who was wrongfully convicted of attempted rape in Redditch in 1996.

His conviction was quashed last year after he approached CCRC for a third time.

Lopes has previously sought a CCRC review through a project at Cardiff Law School, but the application was refused.

Mr Saunders said he would not apply again until he knew the outcome of Nunn's hearing which is expected by the end of July.


Read the original article here


    How can we help?

    Please fill in the form and we’ll get back to you as soon as we can

    We have partnered with Law Share from JMW Solicitors LLP to refer instructions and clients to them, when we are unable to act. By answering yes to this question, you agree that we may pass your details on to Law Share in such circumstances. You are under no obligation to instruct JMW Solicitors LLP after being referred. We may receive a payment from JMW Solicitors LLP further to this referral.