Saunders Law success continues with Disclosure and Barring Service Result
Our client received a letter from the Disclosure and Barring Service stating that they were considering adding our client to the Children's Barred List. Our client received a caution in 2006 for outraging public decency.
Saunders Law made representations as to why our client shouldn’t be included in the Children's Barred List. These representations included but are not limited to:
- We are currently representing our client to make representations for the caution to be removed based on the following grounds: no crime, incorrect disposal and public interest,
- Our client should have never received the police caution for outraging public decency,
- Our client only accepted the police caution due to not receiving legal advice and wrongly believing that he had no realistic alternative,
- Our client has an otherwise exemplary record and is of good character,
- In the event that an application for deletion of the caution is unsuccessful, our client poses no threat because the caution would be disclosed to their employer on a DBS check. It is therefore not proportionate to add our client to the list.
Our representations to the Disclosure and Barring Service were successful, and our client was not added to the Children's Barred List.